Between The Tides

Our island restoration is limited to what happens on land, but we’re not immune to interesting stories about the surrounding sea, and the intertidal zone which is the focus of this article. It’s always nice to see that there are still reasonable numbers of fishes in the very outer Sounds area, and seals, dolphins and orca add excitement. The south end of Puangiangi is a traditional spot for catching blind eels, and Roma Elkington has explained to me how to remove the copious slime from these delicacies. On the sea floor nearby are bryozoan beds (see for example this report by Rob Davidson).

At the shore on the more sheltered western side, I was struck by the lack of crabs and shellfish and put it down to the type of habitat available, but we had the opportunity for an expert assessment when Mike Bradstock visited in March 2022. On safety grounds Mike had to confine his study to the western side also. It is likely to be very different on the eastern side but it would be a mission to find out.

The best way to present this topic I think is to reproduce Mike Bradstock’s report. Take it away, Mike:

Introduction

Four transects (two each at Boatshed Bay and Woolshed Bay) made on 7 to 9 March 2022 all revealed a rather sparse flora and fauna on tidal shores facing southeast to southwest in moderate shelter. Shores on the eastern side, in greater exposure, were not surveyed. Species were identified from Cook (2010), Nelson (2013) and Morton & Miller (1968).

Figure 1: a view of the tidal shore at the location of transect 3 in Boatshed Bay. Below high tide mark periwinkles, barnacles and chitons occupy the upper and middle shore. At bottom, patches of the seaweed Splachnidium approximately indicate low water level at neap tides. The pink zone is coralline “paint”.

The main species found and their distributions are presented below. The shores examined were mostly rocky (country rock) and near-vertical at high water (HW), with sloping rocky or sandy beaches below. Outcrops of country rock, loose rocks, stones and cobbles were widespread across the shore profile and there was sand at many levels.

The vertical distribution of organisms at different sites (Appendix 1) did not greatly vary and suggests the degree of exposure was not much varied. Overall, I did not find any major surprises of species presence or absence, and did not see any adventive marine species either in situ or washed ashore. There was a general paucity of species, particularly red seaweeds, and intertidal organisms that typically form well defined zones on the shore (e.g. barnacles and seaweeds) were not abundant. This overall picture was more like Tasman Bay and the enclosed shores of the Sounds than the shores of Cook Strait, but generally fed with more oceanic water flowing north and south.

A species list is given as Appendix 2.

A generalised profile of the tidal shore

The substratum at HW (as measured in relation to strandlines on the beaches) and down for the first 0.3 m has few visible organisms except two species of tiny periwinkle: the abundant blue-banded Austrolittorina antipodum and the less common brown A. cincta, followed by the snakeskin chiton Sypharochiton pelliserpensis. The highest barnacle on the shore is Epopella plicata, and the large limpet of the middle and upper shore, Cellana denticulata, is conspicuous by its size and high-pitched shell if not by numbers. The barnacles grow individually and in small clusters but cover only a fraction of available space and are too few by far to form a distinct barnacle zone as seen on similar shores in northern NZ. Distribution of the modest barnacle Elminius modestus is patchy and lower on the shore.

Figure 2: A closer view of the mid and upper tidal areas in Figure 1. The approximate position of high water (at spring tide) is marked with a chalk cross at upper centre. From lower left, coralline paint extends higher up the shore in shade. At right, barnacles, chitons and limpets are conspicuous.

The limpets Cellana ornata and C. radians appear at about mid tidal level and extend about a metre lower.

Figure 3: on the upper tidal shore, blue-lined periwinkles and the limpet Cellana ornata. Boatshed Bay.

The only seaweeds seen on the upper shore were sparse karengo, Pyropia sp. (formerly Porphyra columbina) in well sunlit places among periwinkles, chitons and barnacles; and sparse small plants of Ulva (formerly Enteromorpha) compressa, mostly in moist crevices. The encrusting red alga Apophlea sp. is common and widespread on country rock and boulders.

Immediately below is a conspicuous though moderately narrow zone (less than 0.75 metre) of locally abundant red beadlet anemones, Actinia tenebrosa. They are crowded in shaded or wet locations including crevices and pools and rock overhangs, and occur individually or in small groups on the most exposed surfaces. They probably comprise the largest biomass of any shore species here and reflect the effectiveness of tidal currents in providing food-rich water for filter-feeders. They might well be considered the most interesting feature of these shores.

Figure 4: Abundant red anemones, Actinia tenebrosa, dominate the middle shore. Barnacles (Epopella) and limpets (Cellana radians and C. ornata) also present. Woolshed Bay.

From about this level to the lower shore the spotted black top shell Zediloma aethiops is locally abundant, especially under stable rocks, where densities reach over 1,000/m2 (small ones). The largest ones are lowest on the shore though in some places they are scarce. Tide pools at this level contained rather stunted plants of Jupiter’s necklace seaweed Hormosira banksii, with coralline algae and the cat’s eye snail Lunella smaragdus. Apart from small amphipods under rocks, intertidal crustaceans were very scarce, with rare Hemigrapsus edwardsii and Petrolisthes elongatus.

Blue and green mussels (Mytilus edulis and Perna canaliculus) occur in infrequent patches, especially in sheltered crevices, the former slightly higher on the shore and more abundant. They are not abundant enough to form a distinct zone (possibly owing to human predation).

Figure 5: A closer view of anemones crowded in a crevice with barnacles, limpets and chitons.

Around and below the mussels, Corallina officinalis (coralline “paint” and “turf”) form a more or less distinct zone demarcating the lower shore and extending to low tide mark, or low water (LW). The barnacle Epopella extends as far down as this zone, where it is frequently encrusted by Corallina. At this level there is a distinct narrow belt of the brown seaweed Splachnidium rugosum. Red seaweeds, usually a feature of moderately exposed shores, are strikingly absent below this zone.

The subtidal

Low tide mark is delineated approximately by the large brown seaweeds Carpophyllum maschalocarpum (flapjack, slightly above and below LW) and C. flexuosum (at LW and extending to several metres deep subtidally). The main seaweed biomass by far is C. flexuosum, forming dense beds (a “seaweed forest”) buoyed by its small round floats.

Lunella extends into the shallow subtidal, frequently on the fronds of seaweeds. The limpet Cellana stellifera appears about low tide mark. Other molluscs at and below this level include paua (Haliotis iris and H. australis), Cook’s turban shell Cookia sulcata (all sizes including very large specimens grazing among seaweeds on country rock) and the red topshell Cantharidus purpurea grazing on seaweed fronds.

The range of fish species seen was rather narrow and included a few blue cod (Parapercis colias) over rocky open ground, abundant spotties (Notolabrus celidotus) including many juveniles and adult females in weedy and rocky areas, and large schools of the oblique-swimming blenny Forsterygion maryannae in and around rocky crevices and over seaweed. beds. A few female banded parrotfish (Notolabrus cincta), marblefish Aplodactylus arctidens, and a single short-tailed stingray (Dasyatis brevicaudatus) were seen. I might have expected but did not see butterfish, blue moki, red mullet, sweep, yellow-eyed mullet, kahawai and more species of triplefin. These and other fish species are likely also present.

Schooling fish, especially kahawai (Arripis trutta) and jack mackerel (Trachurus spp.), are known to form visible surface schools in the area, but together with marine mammals and seabirds are beyond the scope of this survey.

References

Cook S de C, ed. (2010) New Zealand coastal marine invertebrates. Vol. 1. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.

Nelson, W (2013) New Zealand seaweeds. An illustrated guide. Wellington: Te Papa Press

Morton JE, Miller MC (1968) The New Zealand Sea Shore. Auckland: Collins.

Appendix 1: some examples of tidal range of shore species

Appendix 2: species list

Cook Strait Giant Weta

IMG_0316_1
Female Cook Strait giant weta, Deinacrida (“terrible grasshopper”) rugosa, Mana Island

What should a restored invertebrate fauna look like? Should we be fussed, or should we just be concerned that there is enough biomass of- whatever- to support more interesting higher animals? Is an obsession with charismatic macroinvertebrates a thing, and is it unhealthy?

Inverts have been short-changed in many ways: they are little studied, little-cared-about, sometimes actively disliked by people. It’s highly likely that many incredibly interesting insects, spiders, slaters, snails, slugs, velvet worms and centipedes have been lost for all time from New Zealand, before they were even known to science. We can’t fix that, but we can consider from within the extant taxa what invert biodiversity would be appropriate for Puangiangi.

If we can maintain the predator-free status of the island, prevent incursions of foreign insects like Argentine ants, and ensure that the native vegetation does not become any less diverse, and that its area expands, then we can protect inverts that are already there or that might be able to fly in, be blown in or float in. We are left to think about the ground-dwelling, flightless animals that might have been hardest-hit or extirpated by rats, and inverts that are known from the ecological district that could be expected to be there. So, I think that steers us towards the well known and interesting macroinvertebrates as a matter of course, rather than as a result of an obsession with making a bug zoo. Weta, Cook Strait click beetle, ngaio weevil, flax weevil, Mimopeus beetles, large snails, Peripatus, stick insects come to mind.

Puangiangi already has extremely strong numbers of tree weta; cave weta are present; ground weta might well be but given how cryptic they are, we don’t know. Cook Strait giant weta haven’t been recorded. Mimopeus beetles have recovered rapidly after rats were removed. Flax weevil were confirmed soon after we took over, and their feeding sign is everywhere. It’s interesting that they have little effect on the flax plants they feed on, given the mess the translocated population on Mana may be making. Ngaio weevil and Cook Strait click beetle we haven’t spotted yet, and they could be future targets for translocation. The divaricating shrubs are alive with mating stick insects during the late-summer nights. We have seen a peripatus and some centipedes; Powelliphanta snails are not there, and possibly never were.

As for Cook Strait giant weta, we know they are naturally present elsewhere in the ecological district- on Takapourewa, Kuru Pongi and Mana. They would also be worthy candidates for translocation as they are endemic to the region, and classified as range restricted and vulnerable. They have been translocated successfully to Maud and Matiu Somes (from Mana), Wakaterepapanui (from Takapourewa), Titi and Long Island (from Maud).

The population with the ideal combination of commonness, genetic diversity, closeness and accessibility is on Takapourewa and so, beginning in February 2014, the rangers on Takapourewa began night searches to capture suitable animals. Polly Hall and Andre de Graaf aimed for a range of ages of animals, rather than all big ones, as it is thought that they might only breed once and we did not want to move senescent animals.

Polly and Andre made a holding pen out of a mussel float and stocked it with soil, sticks and branches, topping it up with fresh taupata, tauhinu, carrot and courgette every few days. The animals were held for up to several weeks between supply boats, and batches were packaged up in modified tackle boxes and dropped off as the boat went back to Havelock past Puangiangi. Peter had selected a piece of country similar to their preferred habitat on Takapourewa, which just happened to be right by where the DOC boat could nudge on to the beach. Over three years, 300 weta (52 adult males, 110 adult females and 132 juveniles) were caught, and all but a few were taken directly to Puangiangi in ten trips finishing in September 2016. A few pairs were bred up at Eco World and Tui Nature Reserve, for the 17 progeny to be taken out to Puangiangi too.

WetaReleaseSite
The release site. Tauhinu, Olearia solandri, Coprosma propinqua, low shrubland and pasture. Photo: Peter Gaze

The transfer was acknowledged by forty-odd Ngati Koata, project reps, friends, neighbours and DOC staff during a ceremony on 31 March 2017, which was also the 5th anniversary of purchase of the island. This was the easiest and cheapest project I’ve been involved in where DOC was a major participant. Polly and Andre would get in touch with us when something was happening, rather than us having to follow up, went out at night to catch the animals, looked after them and arranged to have them delivered and let go, wrote it down and reported on it, without any sweat at all being raised by me.

We have been out at night to look for them quite a few times. Numbers seen have been incredibly low, but are perhaps just starting to pick up, with one or two able to be found sheltering in the daytime also. Other translocations that have worked have also had very low encounter rates for several years and we are unconcerned, unless of course predators arrive.

A book everyone should have: Andrew Crowe, Which New Zealand Insect?, 127 pp, Penguin Books, 2002.